ZIFA Presidency candidates embroiled in controversy amidst Serious ethical, Legal, and integrity concerns

 

 Patience Muchemwa

Senior Reporter

 The nominations of Martin Kweza and Walter Magaya for the ZIFA Presidency have sparked intense debate and opposition due to unresolved criminal, civil, and governance issues surrounding both individuals. Formal objections have been lodged, highlighting concerns that render them unfit for leadership roles in Zimbabwean football.

 Objections to Martin Kweza's candidature

 A formal objection was submitted against Martin Kweza, citing ongoing investigations into alleged abuse of office and fraud. In January 2024, a case of work-related criminal abuse of office was filed against Kweza with the Zimbabwe Anti-Corruption Commission (ZACC). Additionally, a fraud complaint was filed by Engineer T. Maurukira, CEO of the Zimbabwe National Water Authority (ZINWA), in July 2024. These unresolved cases raise questions about Kweza's ethical suitability for the ZIFA Presidency.

 Objections to Walter Magaya's candidature

 Walter Magaya faces similar objections, with a series of criminal charges, civil rulings, and governance sanctions casting doubt on his integrity and ability to lead ZIFA responsibly. Magaya faces pending criminal charges for alleged tax violations, an asset forfeiture investigation, and a conviction under the Medicines Control Act for falsely claiming to cure HIV and AIDS. Civil matters, including a debt default and property seizure, have also raised concerns about Magaya's financial stability and ability to fulfill obligations.

 Call for ethical Accountability and Integrity

 Both objections stress the need for ethical accountability and integrity in the ZIFA Presidency. Stakeholders urge the election committee to thoroughly scrutinize candidates and uphold the highest standards of governance to protect Zimbabwean football's reputation and future. With Zimbabwean football at a pivotal juncture, there is increasing pressure on the ZIFA election committee to ensure that candidates facing unresolved criminal, civil, or governance matters are excluded from leadership roles.

Leave Comments

Top