Term extension almost impossible,’ Prof Madhuku sp...

Term extension almost impossible,’ Prof Madhuku speaks

Oscar J. Jeke,

Zim Now Reporter

Constitutional law expert, Professor Lovemore Madhuku, has labelled ZANU PF’s plan to extend President Mnangagwa’s term by two years as almost impossible, adding significant doubt to the party’s proposed constitutional amendment.

In an interview with a local publication, Professor. Madhuku explained, “Legally, you can go through the necessary steps, but understanding those steps reveals the near-impossibility of success. The process requires the publication of the first bill proposing the constitutional amendment, followed by a 90-day public debate period.

“This means ordinary Zimbabweans would engage in discussion during that time. Afterward, it must pass both the National Assembly and the Senate with a two-thirds majority, followed by a national referendum where a simple majority is needed. This chain of events is fraught with challenges, particularly during the public debate, as widespread opposition is likely. Even if it clears Parliament, success in a referendum is uncertain. Such a vote would essentially boil down to a public decision on whether President Mnangagwa should extend beyond the current 10-year term limit, which many citizens may oppose.”

Prof. Madhuku further added, “While technically feasible, meeting the constitutional thresholds is extremely difficult. The time required to complete the amendment process before 2028 may also render it impractical.”

This commentary comes as ZANU PF resolved to pursue a two-year term extension, with the government directed to expedite the process. Party Director of Information and Publicity, Farai Marapira, noted that the final decision rests with President Mnangagwa, who earlier dismissed the 2030 slogan as merely symbolic.

However, President Mnangagwa himself has publicly ruled out an extension noting that, at the end of his current term, he will “go home and rest.” This pronouncement has come under scrutiny from analysts wo view this as a political move to uncover ambitious elements in his own party.

Political analysts have expressed strong disapproval of the proposal. Ernest Mudzengi pointed out that such an extension could set a dangerous precedent for power transitions and contravene Zimbabwe’s supreme law. “It is unconstitutional and undermines the principles that form our nation’s foundation. The move jeopardizes constitutional integrity and sets a poor example for future power transitions,” Mudzengi stated.

Despite potential opposition, Mudzengi acknowledged that President Mnangagwa might succeed due to his influence within the party and the support he has garnered from provincial leaders.

Kudakwashe Munemo, another political expert, echoed these concerns, emphasizing that the proposal threatens national stability. “The law is clear: a president can only serve two terms. Other capable leaders can guide the country forward. The President should prioritize fulfilling his 2023 promises to the people, as he has a social contract with the citizens.”

Munemo also highlighted internal challenges President Mnangagwa might face, citing constitutional barriers and competition within the party. “The military, which played a significant role in the 2017 transition, will also have a say,” he concluded.